HomefolkloreWhither Vampires?

Comments

Whither Vampires? — 2 Comments

  1. Very good points, Stephanie. Thank you for posting this. I had never thought about “Interview…” in societal terms before. But then, I discovered it as a ten or twelve year old finding a paperback at a library book sale — I expected something very different. I believe I still have that book. I tried to read it a few more times, but Rice’s prose style wore on me. I had a little more success with her second book “The Vampire Lestat,” but even that one wore thin for me after about one hundred fifty pages. You make me want to give her another shot though.

    Part of the problem I’m seeing in today’s fiction is that the vampire is in danger of losing its persona as monster, which could deprive it of its ability to fill a role like you describe for “Interview….” Today’s readers will see Louis not in terms of Dracula but in terms of Edward, which diminishes his struggle.

    I could not begin to keep up with the growing list of modern vampire authors, so I won’t be much help on the diversity front. The only one I could point you to would be L.A. Banks, whose books featured a female, African-American protagonist.

    The vampire book I’m most looking forward to is NOS4A2 (the cover image shows the title on a license plate) by Joe Hill. I loved “Horns” and I can’t wait to see what he does with vampires.

  2. Thanks for this thoughtful post. What may have gotten lost over time and over-exposure is how absolutely radical Anne Rice’s Interview with a Vampire seemed in 1976. It actually circulated in galley-form among the staff at Random House, because people were so excited about it. That’s how I first read it. My mother snuck it home from the office and said “wait til you read THIS.” We both experienced it as a wild, sexual, and overtly “queer” telling of vampire desire and its placement in exotic, forgotten New Orleans. At the time, the AIDS crisis was not yet common knowledge and gay rights were just in their infancy as far as the cis hetero world knew. Second Wave feminism was still “new” to many of us. So “Interview” — written by a woman — felt like an incredible bolt from the blue. The use of the “monster” to articulate alternate sexuality isn’t new, but it does seem to gather a peculiar force in the 60’s and 70’s (one thinks of GRENDEL by John Gardner). How that lineage has been used — progressively and regressively (as in the case of Twilight, which makes the vampire quintessentially hetero, and laden with Christian morals) is a complex history worth looking at. I’d be interested to know the extent to which the vampire stories still focus on white people and middle class people (the Kathryn Bigelow movie being an important exception to the class dynamic), and the extent to which queer writers, queer writers of color, trans writers, and others have taken this material on and worked with it creatively.

Leave a Reply

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>